<!-- twin of https://sassani.app/topic/homosexuality -->

# Homosexuality

> Homosexuality reflects collective refusal to blend masculine and feminine energies within, dissolving as a tool when inner integration renders it unnecessary rather than through moral judgment.

- Canonical: https://sassani.app/topic/homosexuality

# Homosexuality

Bashar frames homosexuality as a mirror and a tool, never as a right-or-wrong category. Across every session that addresses it, the same teaching recurs: the outward expression reflects an inner condition of the collective, and it will dissolve — not because it is condemned, but because it is no longer needed — once each individual integrates the masculine and feminine energies within themselves.

## Neither right nor wrong — a reflection of the collective

Bashar's first and most consistent point is that homosexuality is not a moral question. When asked directly about organized religion's condemnation of it, he replies that nothing is either right or wrong, and that the idea has "blossomed" in human society for a specific collective reason: for tens of thousands of years the mainstream refused to accept that every individual contains both the masculine and the feminine energies.

The outward expression is therefore a teaching device the collective drew to itself — a living reflection of an inner refusal.

That framing is repeated verbatim across multiple sessions. In The Awakening IV he calls homosexuality "a tool" that became necessary because "those individuals were willing to reflect that each individual, regardless of physical properties, contains masculine and feminine principles completely diametrically opposed to what their physical representation was."

In Your Relationship To Your Soul he says the same thing the other way around: sexuality "is not right, is not wrong; it simply is a reflection of your society's lack of willingness to accept that each and every individual has the polarities within them."

## The mechanism: an outer reflection of an inner imbalance

The teaching has a precise mechanism. Because the mainstream refused to blend the polarities within itself, certain souls chose lifetimes that would externalize the polarity in an obvious form — "to attract lifestyles that would generate within them an obvious manifestation of the polarity energy within them, regardless of their physiology."

Their embodiment became a message held up to the collective: every individual contains both energies, regardless of body. The reflection persists as long as the collective refuses the message.

In Rats, Bashar extends the same logic to the symbol of AIDS, reading disease and the homosexuality symbol as one continuous reflection: society's refusal to examine its own polarities "created the opportunity for individuals to express what seems to be an imbalance of one side or the other of their sexuality, as a reflection that each individual contains the ability of the expression of both energies."

The lesson is structural, not punitive — the symbol exists to force a reckoning with the inner blending the mainstream has avoided.

## The dissolution: integration makes the tool obsolete

Bashar is explicit that homosexuality is not something to be "overcome" or judged away. It simply becomes unnecessary when the inner work is done. When individuals "marry within themselves the masculine and feminine energies and blend these ideas, not because it is right or wrong, but simply because it will no longer be needed, homosexuality will simply not exist in your society. There will be love for all in an equal way."

The same dissolution is named across the corpus. In Be Who And What You Are he says that once society accepts its own maleness and femaleness, individuals incarnating "will not need to express the tool that you call homosexuality, for they will have chosen consciously what idea of the polarity they wish to be."

In The Awakening IV: "when all individuals marry those two aspects within themselves equally, there will be no need of any form of disease, and likely no more homosexuality as a tool, because it will no longer be necessary."

In Rats: "when there is that blending and that marriage of the energy within the being that you are, there will no longer be any need for the expression of what you call homosexuality as a tool, nor for any disease."

The tool is provisional; it retires when the lesson lands.

## A broader allowance of energy and expression

A later session extends the framing beyond the masculine-feminine polarity to the full range of gender and sexual expression. Many beings, Bashar says, "have decided that they will act as an example of the different kinds of energies and the different kinds of expressions that a human can represent," so that society is "full of all sorts of different ways of representing the concept of gender and sexuality and expression and consciousness to give everyone an understanding that you are far greater… than you think."

The purpose is to loosen the collective's fear of what it contains. Attraction itself, in this frame, is a vibration-to-vibration recognition that "a compatible consciousness vibration" has a purpose — to assist everyone in the relationship "to learn what they need to learn to become more aware of more of who they are,"[ ^dec7predictions-qa-text] regardless of the body.

## The individual service: assisting the balance

Bashar tells one questioner, newly attracted to a homosexual man, that as she blends her own masculinity and femininity within herself she can "assist individuals to blend those ideas within themselves" — to "allow them to go back to the zero-rest balance point where no imbalance can exist."

The chapter therefore closes on the practical axis the teaching implies: the work is inner first, and only secondarily about the other. The reflection fades on its own once the inner marriage is real.

## Practical implications

Drop the moral frame. Bashar is explicit that homosexuality is "not right, not wrong." Treating it as a moral category misses the teaching, which is structural and collective.

Look for the inner reflection. The outward expression mirrors an inner refusal to blend masculine and feminine within each individual. The work the symbol points to is inner integration, not external judgment of others.

Allow the full range of expression without fear. The variety of gender and sexual expression in society is, in Bashar's framing, a deliberate teaching device — a chance to "loosen up the fears about what it is they contain."

Read attraction as compatible vibration with a purpose. Relationships of every kind serve mutual learning and self-awareness; the body it comes through is secondary to the consciousness-level recognition.

Do not treat the symbol as permanent. The tool is provisional. As inner blending becomes real, the symbol is no longer needed — not because it has been suppressed, but because the lesson has landed.

## Representative passages

Nothing is either right or wrong, but the idea has blossomed in your society because for many tens of thousands of years the mainstream of your society has refused to accept that each and every individual has within them the capacity to blend the masculine and the feminine energies into one idea. … When individuals marry within themselves the masculine and feminine energies and blend these ideas, not because it is right or wrong, but simply because it will no longer be needed, homosexuality will simply not exist in your society. There will be love for all in an equal way.— Bashar, Opening Night (opening-night#qa-14)

The denial of that equality within the self created the need for the tool of homosexuality, because those individuals were willing to reflect that each individual, regardless of physical properties, contains masculine and feminine principles completely diametrically opposed to what their physical representation was. When all individuals marry those two aspects within themselves equally, there will be no need of any form of disease, and likely no more homosexuality as a tool, because it will no longer be necessary.— Bashar, The Awakening IV (the-awakening-iv#qa-22)

Sexuality in your society is not right, is not wrong; it simply is a reflection of your society's lack of willingness to accept that each and every individual has the polarities within them. When you allow yourselves to do that, homosexuality will not vanish because it is wrong; it will disappear because it is no longer needed.— Bashar, Your Relationship To Your Soul (your-relationship-to-your-soul#qa-16)

## Related

- [Masculine Feminine Balance](https://sassani.app/topic/masculine-feminine-balance)
- [Blending](https://sassani.app/topic/blending)
- [Definitions & Beliefs](https://sassani.app/topic/definitions-and-beliefs)
- [Self-Acceptance](https://sassani.app/topic/self-acceptance)
- [Relationships](https://sassani.app/topic/relationships)

Markdown twin of https://sassani.app/topic/homosexuality. The HTML page is the source of truth.
